The SunSpider, Kraken and Octane tests focus on JavaScript performance, reflecting the general responsiveness of apps such as Gmail and Google Drive. To get an all-round picture, we tested each platform with a selection of five benchmarks.
After all, these days we use our browsers for everything from sending and receiving email and working on documents to watching movies and playing games. We started our tests by looking at web-browser performance.
#Windows vs mac os x windows 7
Since most Mac users keep their operating system current, we used the latest release of OS X 10.9, Mavericks for Windows, we used the most popular version of the OS, namely Windows 7 Home Premium, running natively on the hardware. The other was a 2011 MacBook Air, with a 1.6GHz Core i5-2467M processor, 4MB of 1,333MHz DDR3 RAM and an Apple SM128C SSD.īoth machines were set up as Boot Camp dual-boot systems. One was a 2008 iMac with a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo E8135 processor, 3GB of 667MHz DDR2 RAM and a 250GB Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 3.5in hard disk. To ensure our results were representative, we tested the OSes on the same hardware – a pair of mid-range Mac systems with relatively limited power, where performance could easily be a real-world issue. Our mission was to find out whether Apple’s native OS gives a performance advantage over Windows, or whether it’s actually slower. With that in mind, we set out with a stopwatch to time how long OS X and Windows took to complete a variety of common desktop tasks.
As such, they perform the same jobs quite differently. What’s more, while many mainstream applications are offered on both platforms, they’re implemented in different ways, as dictated by the different platform architectures. OS X and Windows are based on different kernels, with different approaches to multitasking and virtual memory. One factor that’s difficult to quantify is performance.
0 kommentar(er)
